Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

In the House of Commons debate on the agricultural sector and environmental issues, the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Steve Reed, outlined the government's position. He emphasized the importance of innovation in supporting farmers to boost food security, productivity, and nature recovery. Reed stated that the government will promote the UK as a great place for technology innovators to drive investment and create high-skilled jobs, helping farmers embrace the latest technology and best practices. The official opposition, represented by the shadow Secretary of State Steve Barclay, challenged the government's stance. Barclay questioned whether the government would rule out cuts to the farming budget, as there were reports of a £100 million reduction. He pressed the ministers to provide clarity on the future funding for farmers, arguing that they need certainty to plan their businesses. The debate that followed covered a range of topics. Members of Parliament discussed the need to increase the uptake of environmental land management schemes, with concerns raised about farmers being "locked in" to these schemes. The government acknowledged the challenges and committed to reviewing the schemes to ensure they work for all farmers, including small, grassland, upland, and tenant farmers. The issue of water pollution and the accountability of water companies was also extensively debated. The government introduced the Water (Special Measures) Bill, which aims to strengthen the power of regulators and bring criminal charges for obstruction. Members from both sides of the House highlighted the need to protect local waterways, such as canals and creeks, from toxic pollution. The debate also touched on the government's plans to support British food producers, with the ministers emphasizing the commitment to a new deal for farmers to boost rural economic growth and strengthen food security. However, concerns were raised about potential cuts to the farming budget, and the ministers reiterated that the spending review process would determine the final allocations. Throughout the debate, the government representatives emphasized their intention to restore stability and confidence in the agricultural sector, promote innovation, and ensure that environmental land management schemes and water regulation are fit for purpose. The opposition challenged the government to provide clear assurances on funding and to hold water companies accountable for pollution.