Monday
22
Jul2024
Debate on the Address
Debate
Summary
The debate began with the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves, outlining the Government's position. She highlighted that the new Labour Government has inherited the worst economic situation since the Second World War, with high inflation, rising interest rates, and a cost-of-living crisis. However, she emphasized that the Government's number one mission is to secure sustained economic growth, through measures such as the Budget Responsibility Bill, the national wealth fund, and pension reforms.
The official opposition, represented by the shadow Chancellor Jeremy Hunt, responded by disputing the Government's claims about the economic inheritance. He argued that the UK economy was in a strong position, with fast growth, low unemployment, and inflation at target, when the Conservatives left office. Hunt accused the Chancellor of planning tax rises that would undermine economic growth, despite her promises not to raise taxes during the election campaign.
The wide-ranging debate that followed saw many new Members of Parliament make their maiden speeches, showcasing the diversity and character of their constituencies. A number of key themes emerged, including the need to support struggling high streets and town centres, improve public services like the NHS and social care, and tackle regional inequalities and the cost-of-living crisis. Several speakers from both sides of the House emphasized the importance of economic growth, but differed on the best approach, with the Conservatives warning against excessive state intervention, and Labour members arguing for a more active role for government in driving investment and supporting working families.
The debate also touched on issues such as housing, planning reform, climate change, and the future of the Union. Members highlighted the unique challenges and opportunities in their local areas, from the industrial heritage of constituencies like Hartlepool and Whitehaven, to the rural idylls of Harpenden and Berkhamsted. Throughout the discussion, there was a clear sense of Members' passion for their communities and a determination to be effective advocates for their constituents.
Overall, the debate provided a window into the priorities and perspectives of the new Parliament, as the Government sets out its agenda for economic and social renewal, and the opposition seeks to hold it to account. With deeply held differences on the role of the state and the best path to prosperity, the stage is set for lively and substantive debates in the months and years ahead.