Second Reading

The Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, opened the debate by introducing the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill, also known as "Martyn's law". She explained that the bill aims to ensure that those responsible for certain public premises and events take steps to reduce the risk and impact of potential terrorist attacks. The Home Secretary paid tribute to Figen Murray, whose son Martyn was killed in the 2017 Manchester Arena attack, and who has tirelessly campaigned for this legislation. The shadow Home Secretary, James Cleverly, responded by expressing the Opposition's support for the bill's aims and aspirations. He acknowledged the need to strike the right balance between public protection and avoiding undue burdens on businesses and venues, particularly smaller ones. Cleverly sought assurances about the role and readiness of the new regulator, the Security Industry Authority, as well as the potential for feedback and adjustment of the legislation as it is implemented. The debate that followed saw contributions from members across the House. Many speakers, including those representing constituencies affected by past terrorist attacks, welcomed the bill and praised the campaigning efforts of Figen Murray and others. Concerns were raised about the potential impact on smaller venues, community organisations and places of worship, with calls for the legislation to be proportionate and for adequate support and guidance to be provided. The need to learn lessons from Northern Ireland's experience of terrorism was also highlighted. Several members emphasised the importance of ensuring that the new requirements are enforceable and effective, with suggestions around the role of the regulator, the use of physical security measures, and the interplay with planning and insurance processes. The evolving nature of the terrorist threat was also noted, with calls for the legislation to remain adaptable. Overall, the debate demonstrated broad cross-party support for the bill's objectives, while also highlighting the need to carefully consider the practical implications and ensure that the legislation strikes the right balance between public safety and the needs of businesses, community organisations and the public.