Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill

The Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, opened the debate by introducing the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill, also known as "Martyn's law". She explained that the bill aims to ensure that those responsible for certain public premises and events take steps to reduce the risk and impact of potential terrorist attacks. The Home Secretary paid tribute to Figen Murray, whose son Martyn was killed in the 2017 Manchester Arena attack, and who has tirelessly campaigned for this legislation. The shadow Home Secretary, James Cleverly, responded by expressing the Opposition's support for the bill's aims and aspirations. He acknowledged the need to strike the right balance between public protection and avoiding undue burdens on businesses and venues, particularly smaller ones. Cleverly sought assurances about the role and readiness of the new regulator, the Security Industry Authority, as well as the potential for feedback and adjustment of the legislation as it is implemented. The debate that followed saw broad cross-party support for the bill, with many Members sharing personal experiences and perspectives. Several speakers, including the former Home Secretary Priti Patel and the DUP's Jim Shannon, drew on the history of terrorism in Northern Ireland to highlight the importance of preparedness and the need to learn from past experiences. Concerns were raised about the potential impact on smaller venues, community spaces, and places of worship, with calls for the legislation to be proportionate and for adequate support and guidance to be provided. The need to address physical security vulnerabilities, such as CCTV coverage, was also discussed. Members from constituencies affected by recent terrorist attacks, such as Altrincham and Sale West and Bolton North East, spoke passionately about the importance of the legislation and the need to honour the memory of those who lost their lives. The two maiden speeches, from the new Members for Tiverton and Minehead and Forest of Dean, also highlighted the local impact and importance of the bill. Overall, the debate demonstrated a shared determination to learn from past tragedies and take practical steps to enhance the security of public spaces and events, while ensuring that the measures are proportionate and supportive of businesses and communities.