Wednesday
11
Sept2024
Port Talbot Transition Project
Ministeral Statement
Summary
The Secretary of State for Business and Trade, Jonathan Reynolds, opened the debate by outlining the improved deal the Labour Government has secured for the workers of Tata Steel's plant in Port Talbot. He acknowledged the previous government's failure to act, which had left the steel industry in a perilous position. However, Reynolds stated that this new deal represents a better outcome for the community than the original proposal.
The key features of the deal include a process to assess investment opportunities for new capabilities to deliver more secure, long-term jobs; efforts to avoid compulsory redundancies through job matching, retraining, and improved voluntary redundancy terms; and the release of 385 acres of the site for sale or transfer to bring in more employers. Reynolds also announced the government's intention to introduce a new UK-wide steel strategy to equip the industry with the right support to adapt and thrive in the new green economy.
In response, the shadow Minister, Greg Smith, accused Labour of presiding over the demise of the steel sector, noting that output and jobs had declined significantly under the previous Labour government. He questioned why the Secretary of State did not ensure the blast furnace would remain open until the new electric arc furnace is operational, and expressed concern about the lack of detail on domestic production of virgin steel.
The debate that followed saw contributions from members across the House. The Chair of the Business and Trade Committee, Liam Byrne, welcomed the announcement and emphasized the need to de-risk the demand for steel through procurement and the expansion of the offshore wind industry. The Liberal Democrat spokesperson, Sarah Olney, praised the steps taken but called for the steel strategy to be fully aligned with a wider industrial strategy.
Other members, such as Priti Patel and Dr Andrew Murrison, raised concerns about the impact of high electricity prices on the competitiveness of electric arc furnaces and the potential for a shift towards imports. The Secretary of State acknowledged these challenges and stated that addressing the competitiveness of industrial electricity prices would be a key priority.
Throughout the debate, the Secretary of State defended the government's actions, arguing that they had achieved the maximum improvement possible within the constraints they inherited. He expressed frustration at the lack of progress made by the previous government and emphasized the need for a long-term, strategic approach to support the steel industry's transition to a greener future.