Infected Blood Inquiry

The Government, represented by the Paymaster General Nick Thomas-Symonds, provided an update on the progress in responding to the infected blood inquiry's report. He acknowledged the "harrowing" and "devastating" findings of the inquiry, which uncovered a grave injustice spanning decades. The Government reiterated its apology and commitment to providing comprehensive compensation to those infected and affected as quickly as possible. The official opposition, led by John Glen, the shadow Paymaster General, welcomed the statement and reiterated the apology. He sought assurances on the timeline for the debate on the inquiry's recommendations, the publication of Sir Robert Francis's engagement report, and the completion of the 90-day interim compensation payments. He also raised questions about the role of the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee in scrutinizing the Government's progress. The debate that followed saw cross-party support for the Government's actions, with members from various parties sharing the personal stories of their constituents affected by the scandal. Key topics discussed included the need for transparency and the involvement of the infected and affected community in the compensation process, the importance of addressing the culture of defensiveness in the public sector, and the Government's plans for memorialization and ensuring accountability through the duty of candour legislation. Members emphasized the long-overdue justice for the victims and their families, who had fought tirelessly for decades to have their voices heard. The Paymaster General reiterated the Government's commitment to working closely with the devolved administrations, publishing Sir Robert Francis's report, and ensuring that the compensation scheme is designed with the input and trust of the affected community. He also acknowledged the need to learn lessons from previous compensation schemes and to tackle the culture of defensiveness that has allowed such scandals to occur. Overall, the debate reflected a shared sense of responsibility across the House to deliver justice and meaningful change in the wake of this devastating scandal, with a focus on transparency, accountability, and the central role of the victims and their families in the process.